Aug 23

Like in previous weeks, more Samsung phones passed through the Federal Communications Commission since Monday. But Sony Ericsson also had a few new models, most notably the Sony Ericsson C905.

(Credit:
Sony Ericsson)

Because the FCC has to certify every phone sold in the United States, not to mention test its SAR rating, the agency’s online database offers a lot of sneak peeks to those who dig. And to save you the trouble, Crave has combed through the database for you. Here are a selection of filings from the past week on new and upcoming cell phones. Click through to read the full report.

LG AX265

LG CF750

LG KC910QA

Motorola

Motorola

Motorola

Motorola i9

Nokia (RM-494)

Nokia (RM-384)

Panasonic

Pantech C320

RIM BlackBerry

Samsung SCH-U650

Samsung SGH-F128

Samsung SGH-T201G

Sony Ericsson C905c

Sony Ericsson S302

ZTE GX761

ZTE Vodafone 1231

Sony Ericsson C905c

HP FS88/FS90

Huawei U3307q

Kyocera S1300

LG L02A

Aug 23

(Credit:
Kevin Ho)

Blinged out iPhone cases from Gilty Couture

Much like CES, the vast majority of
iPhone accessories were limited to carrying cases or skins, which is surprising given that this was the event where the iPhone was introduced. While entries from iSkin and CaseLogic were there, these entries from Gilty Couture caught my eye. A gold-plated case ($99) and a diamond-encrusted (not real diamonds, right?) case ($135). However, not sure what the taste factor would be here. When we rolled up to the booth it looked as if a deal was going down, so you may see these soon.

iSkin's offerings: typical

(Credit:
Kevin Ho)

Aug 23

“Yes, it was sensitive privacy information, but not the stuff that was most sensitive,” the executive told the paper, adding that a preliminary investigation showed that information was not compromised.

Early Tuesday, however, the computer was found in the same company office from which it was supposedly stolen on July 26, Allison Beer, senior vice president for corporate development for Verified Identity Pass, which runs the Clear screening program, told The San Francisco Chronicle. The computer, which held names, addresses, and birthdates for people applying to the program, was found in the same airport office but not in its previous location, the executive told the newspaper.

As a result of the investigation, new sign-ups for the program have been suspended. The program lets travelers pay to have the TSA verify their identities, allowing them access to special security lanes in airports to avoid lengthy security line waits.

A laptop with information on prescreened travelers, which was reported stolen, has been found, and the incident may be relabeled the case of the misplaced laptop.

Late Monday, the Transportation Security Administration had announced that a laptop containing data on about 33,000 travelers who had applied for a national airport security fast-pass card was believed to have been stolen from a locked office at the San Francisco Airport in late July.

Aug 23

Now I could go on and describe the three panels that I attended in excruciating detail, but in the interest of not putting you to sleep, I think we’ll discuss something that never fails to incite some form of interest: good ol’ Digital Rights Management. Ah, DRM…what a tangled web you weave. The technology was a hot topic throughout the course of the conference. Unsurprisingly, the subject turned into a rousing debate during the Artists, Copyrights & Technologies panel, with panelists talking over one another and audience members chiming in out of turn. It was quite the frenzy. And it was great. Clearly, DRM is a touchy topic for many people who are involved in digital content–and that’s a lot of people. We have the producers, negotiators, marketers, distributors, purchasers, and even educators, which is the term I apply loosely to myself and other tech editors who have the job of explaining DRM to frustrated users. Indeed, it takes very little provocation for me to get riled up about it myself–if you have any doubts, have a listen to the MP3 Insider podcast.

First, many people are willing to contribute directly to the artist–or even invest in them–if they are given the opportunity and easy access to digital music that they can use how and where they please. In fact, there are those of us who believe that given the choice between this and getting free music from a questionable source, the overwhelming majority will choose the former. This also plays nicely into the idea that people value something more if they pay for it (even if it’s just a penny), and this is an important thing for the musicians and many of the listeners. Not to say people still shouldn’t be able to buy from stores such as iTunes, but once you take away the DRM it frees people up to purchase from many different sources for a variety of players, rather than getting stuck in a monopolostic “one device, one service” situation.

The other point is that not all DRM is bad. For example, music subscription services could not exist without it. The copy protection is necessary in order for the services to keep track of the time cycles of the subscriptions and to cut off access when a user ceases to pay. It’s also necessary for Internet radio services to use some encryption–also DRM–in order to stay up and running, and I think we can all agree that having Internet radio readily available is a good thing. Innovative devices such as the Ibiza Rhapsody, the Slacker Portable Player, and the Sansa Connect would also not survive without DRM. The bottom line is that there should be different types of DRM to serve different purposes, but in the end what it should do is open up more opportunities for users to listen to music, rather than restrict and confuse.

Earlier this week, I attended the SanFran Music Tech Summit, best described as a meeting of the minds of those who are deeply involved or invested in the music technology space. To quote the event Web site: “We will meet to discuss the evolving music/business/technology ecosystem in a proactive, conducive to deal-making environment.” I know…sounds a touch boring, but it was actually quite the opposite. In fact, I’ve come to the realization that conferences with an emphasis on panels are infinitely more informative, entertaining, and relaxing than those centering around massive product launches (ahem, CES). The panels covered topics of varying interest in the music space, and although none really focused on hardware devices, each offered some interesting insight into how technology continues to change to music industry as well as what it is doing to help consumers hear what they want and discover new content.

OK, after that little DRM love fest I just had, I’m feeling a little dirty and would just like to state for the record that when it comes to piecemeal purchased downloads from online stores, I think they should all be DRM-free. And based on the existence of Amazon Digital Music and recent announcements from Napster and iTunes (not to mention a conversation with Rhapsody), that’s the way things are headed…and soon, at that. In the end, the consumer will win (I hope) and that’s all that matters to me. In closing, I’d like to push my personal agenda/belief that subscription music is the wave of the future, and quote Ted Cohen, who was the panelist from TAG Strategic: “You don’t need to own it anymore…and it’s not about ‘renting’ music; it’s about gaining access.”

But back to the panelists. There was quite an array of backgrounds represented, which is always good at these “round tables.” The moderator was an independent musician, as was the representative from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and the founder of CD Baby (who, incidentally, founded the site to promote his own music–gotta love that). Then, there was the CEO of Songbird, the CEO and Chair of TAG Strategic, and a lawyer specializing in artists’ rights. The moderator and the EFF rep (unsurprisingly) were the most outspoken against DRM, essentially noting that it restricted the artist and consumer alike and was the reason that many people acquired music through illegal means (P2P services)–they want to be able to get the music they like and play it on any device they want, i.e. fair use. That seemed to be the general feeling of the audience as well. For the most part, positive comments made by other panelists about DRM were met with at least a hint of disdain. Mostly, I think, because people have trouble separating DRM from its reputation, but there are some logical points to be gleaned from both sides the conversation.

Aug 23

The first is that the company provided assistance “in connection with an intelligence activity” authorized by the president between September 11, 2001 and January 17, 2007, when the wiretap program was altered to include more judicial oversight. The second condition involves a company that received a “written request” from the U.S. Justice Department saying the activity was lawful and authorized by the president. (AT&T has suggested once, and twice, that such a paper trail exists.)

Wednesday’s vote followed a last-minute effort by liberal and libertarian activists to convince enough Democrats to kill or modify the bill. DailyKos called the bill “a pardon to Bush”; some activists created a Wiki to hone their message; a Salon columnist dubbed the bill a “coverup of surveillance crimes.”

The Democratic-controlled Senate handed President Bush a major political victory on Wednesday by voting to derail lawsuits against telecommunications companies that unlawfully opened their networks to the National Security Agency.

Many of those efforts were aimed at Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate, who told us half a year ago that he would definitely not support retroactive immunity. That was then. Now he does–and he voted for the final bill on Wednesday.

Under Sec. 802 of the Senate bill, which amends the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, no lawsuit may proceed against any “electronic communication service provider” if either one of two conditions is met.

It’s not yet clear what this means for the lawsuits against telecommunications companies, including one that the Electronic Frontier Foundation brought against AT&T that is currently before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.

Earlier, by a 32-66 vote, the Senate rejected an amendment that would have removed the portion of the legislation offering retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies that engaged in illegal activities. The U.S. House of Representatives already approved the underlying legislation last month.

Senators voted 69 to 28 for the bill, which would rewrite federal wiretap laws by granting retroactive immunity to telecommunications companies as long as the government claims the request was “lawful” and authorized by the president.

Kevin Bankston, an EFF staff attorney, says his group will continue to pursue its lawsuit. “We’ll be challenging the constitutionality of this law,” he said. “We think it unconstitutionally violates separation of powers and due process… We are going to be challenging this immunity as unconstitutional.”

Opponents of the bill said it would allow Bush to cover up illegal warrantless wiretapping. “If Congress short-circuits these lawsuits, we will have lost a prime opportunity to finally achieve accountability for these years of law-breaking,” said Sen. Russ Feingold, a Wisconsin Democrat who is a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee. “That’s why the administration has been fighting so hard for this immunity.”

Sen. Hillary Clinton voted against it. Sen. John McCain, the Republican presidential candidate, wasn’t present for the vote but has repeatedly stressed his support for the measure (including in our voters’ guide published earlier this year).

Aug 23

(Credit:
Intel)

That Intel will be working tangentially with OLPC again is notable. The chipmaker left its position as board member of OLPC in January, citing “fundamental differences” between the two companies’ visions for low-cost computing. Previous to that, OLPC’s founder Nicholas Negroponte had asked Intel to stop selling their Classmate PC platform because it was interfering with sales of the XO. Unsurprisingly, Intel declined his request.

Bender is the inventor of the kid-friendly interface, which sits on top of a computer’s operating system. His company, Sugar Labs, was spun off from OLPC in May. At the time of the announcement, Bender said Sugar Labs was already talking about sharing the UI with at least four other low-cost laptop makers, including Asus.

The inventor of the Sugar user interface used in the One Laptop Per Child’s XO says his company is developing a version for Intel’s own low-cost laptop.

He described OLPC as the “primary, but not exclusive, downstream project” for Sugar Labs, and confirmed that the two companies continue to work together on further development of the UI.

Walter Bender said in an interview Thursday with PC World that “a community volunteer is working with Intel on Sugar for the Classmate PC. Sugar Labs helped to expedite the relationship.”

Aug 23

You can buy the new drive right now for about $25, which is rather expensive considering the relatively small amount of storage space. I believe the price will go down in the near future. Nonetheless, Corsair backs it up with 10 year limited warranty. I think it’s worth the current price, if you want something really tiny and–more importantly–negligence-proof. Speaking of which, I know I am going to get myself one.

(Credit: Cosair)

The all new 4GB Flash Voyager Mini from Cosair.

The Flash Voyager Mini features a cap-less retractable connector plug, which easily opens with the flick of the thumb (and protects the chip inside while closed). It utilizes the latest chip-on-board technology, which allows the entire USB connector to be easily retracted into the drive. The new design makes the drive smaller and also helps prevent it from damage caused by daily life mishaps.

I’ve accidentally left my thumdrives in the pocket and let them go through the laundry treatment multiple times. Some times they survived, other times I had to buy a new one. Either way, I had to deal with this familiar lingering bad feeling after finding the little device inside the dryer. It’s like “Gosh, I couldn’t believe it happened, again!” And yet, I just can’t guarantee that it won’t. This is why I’ve been very happy with Cosair’s Flash Voyager series that features a water resistance and shockproof housing.

Mishaps-proof, the tiny Voyager Mini is about as light as a piece of gum.

(Credit: Cosair)

And today, the device got a new form factor. It’s now has is ultra compact with a size that’s about one third of the original Flash Voyager. The all-new Flash Voyager Mini offers 4GB of storage and weight just 0.2 ounces (about as heavy as a piece of gum). Like other Flash Voyager flash drives, the Mini is covered in rubber and is water and shock resistant.

Aug 23

It’s difficult to judge a product like the V550 Nano based just on pictures–mousing preferences are such a personal thing, as we’ve seen–but I do like the idea of being able to roam from room to room without juggling my laptop, cell phone, mouse, and beverage (one of which is almost always dropped in the process).

Now there’s a new Nano in Logitech’s lineup: the V550 Nano, announced on Wednesday, adds a unique “clip and go” dock that lets you attach the mouse to your laptop’s lid.

(Credit:
Logitech)

When it was announced last year, the Logitech VX Nano notebook mouse earned a CNET Editors’ Choice award for its compact, comfortable shape and dual scrolling modes.

Otherwise, the V550 Nano incorporates all the features we loved about the VX Nano, including the dual-mode scroll wheel, tiny USB receiver, and 2.4GHz wireless technology. Even better, the $60 V550 Nano costs a bit less than its predecessor.

According to the company, plenty of users carry their laptops among rooms in the house or from a desk to a conference room at work; the dock lets you carry the mouse and laptop in one hand. “Now, you won’t have to choose between grabbing your mouse or a cup of coffee,” a Logitech rep quips in the press release.

What do you think: is it hot or not?

Aug 23

(Credit:
Nikon)

(Credit:
Nikon)

The 10-megapixel camera features a 5x Zoom-Nikkor lens, an HDMI jack, and all the shooting modes you’re likely to find on this year’s models including Smile Mode and Blink Warning.

For example, should you want to take a portrait shot you’ll be able to use the new Portrait One-Touch Zoom function that’ll automatically zoom in by tapping on the subject and set the shot up with the correct framing and focus. You’ll of course need your fingertips–or the included stylus–for more than just taking pictures.

In playback mode, you use your fingertips to scroll through your pics and touching the screen lets you instantly zoom in. There’s also a Draw Function for adding notes or drawings to the images.

Available in crimson red, espresso black, arctic white, burgundy, champagne pink, and platinum bronze, the S60 hits stores in September 2008 at an MSRP of $349.95.

Since we haven’t tested one yet I’m on the fence as to whether “all touch-screen, all the time” is a blessing or a curse (likely a little of each), but from strictly a feature standpoint it sounds like a fun camera.

Here, my friends, is 3.5 inches of touch-screen bliss on a compact point-and-shoot from Nikon, the Coolpix S60. The only buttons on it are for power and the shutter, everything else requires some finger-on-display action.

Aug 23

Call me old-fashioned, but I don’t really appreciate the benefits of mesh, either. I prefer the comfort and feel of leather. I also didn’t want a zillion controls that depend on my ability to determine what’s right for my back. I wanted a simple chair that was designed to adapt.

You see, I work at home - a lot - so I spend beacoup time in my desk chair. I’m also 50 and my back isn’t in the greatest shape. I started with an old desk chair I’d had for years, but 4 years ago I bought a new chair online for $275. I thought I was getting an ergonomic leather chair for a good deal. Not exactly. Sure, there were lots of controls and adjustments, but amazingly, they didn’t combine to create an ergonomic or even a comfortable chair. Also, the leather was cheap.

The Leap chair from Steelcase met all that criteria. Its patented “live back” technology, intuitive controls, and classic design, were exactly what I was looking for. There was only one problem: it didn’t come with a headrest, not even an optional one. I really wanted a headrest.

As it turns out, Steelcase had another chair called Think.

Here’s how I ended up with Think and my assessment of the product. Keep in mind that I don’t review products for a living. That said, I am compulsive; my wife says I overanalyze everything. So when it came to the chair for my home office, I took it very seriously.

I narrowed my search down to chairs that got the best reviews: the Aeron by Herman Miller, the Freedom by HumanScale, the Ergohuman by Eurotech, the Leap chair by Steelcase, and a few others.

I recently looked into the options and finally settled on a Think chair from Steelcase. The manufacturer markets Think as “The chair with a brain and a conscience.” It’s supposed to adjust itself to your body. But it isn’t cheap.

Getting a good deal on such a hot product was a little tough, until I found Office Environments - an authorized Steelcase dealer in Charlotte, North Carolina. I got the chair - loaded with the features, materials and colors I specified - for about $900 plus state sales tax. And the folks at Office Environments provided world-class, personalized service that met my ultra-high internet shopping standards.

After some research, I figured out that you could spend a couple hundred bucks for a cheap knockoff or $600 plus, and I mean plus, for the real deal; there’s no in-between. My back didn’t like the cheap route, so this time I decided to do it right.

Think incorporates much of the Leap chair’s technology, plus its controls are even more intuitive. Not only does it conform to your spine, but the back tension is proportional to your body weight. It also has an optional headrest and was a bit less expensive than the Leap chair.

Think chair

And for all you green techies out there, get this: Think is so green that Mother Nature’s green with envy. It’s 99% recyclable, Greenguard Indoor Air Quality Certified, and it’s cradle-to-cradle certified by MBDC - which evaluates a product’s environmental impact throughout its lifecycle.

I love this chair. I know that sounds like an advertisement for an expensive product, but for me, it’s worth it. What kind of chair do you sit on?

That’s when I realized that some of these chairs were really, really ugly, especially from the back. My house is kind of old world and I didn’t want my office to look like a hospital room for a paraplegic (no offense) or something out of the movie Alien.

(Credit:
Steelcase)

Think a chair isn’t a gadget? Have you checked out the controls on any of these ergonomic chairs lately? Some of them are even licensing the technology for use in other markets.

We spend lots of time with electronic gadgets and most of it sitting on our behinds.
Xbox and
iPhone may get all the press, but one of the most important gadgets in your office is your desk chair.

« Previous Entries Next Entries »